![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home
Process Simulation
Device Simulation
Interactive Tools
Virtual Wafer Fab
Licensing
Platforms
Services
Design Flows
Technical Library
Downloads and Support
Corporate
Learn more
|
JFET/MESFET TRIQUINT Models (Level=5 and level=7)Introduction Until now, SmartSpice has supported the TriQuint model designated TOM using the Level=5 model parameter. SmartSpice now supports the TriQuint-2 MESFET model designated TOM-2. This model is accessible as a standard MESFET model, using the Level=7 model parameter. It is an incremental improvement based on TriQuint?s original MESFET model. All current analyses are currently supported (dc, ac, transient and noise).
Physical Effects
Simulation Model
Table 1. Parameters of the TOM-2 TriQuint MESFET model. The model parameters BETA, VTO, ALPHA, GAMMA, DELTA, Q are common for both the original and improved TriQuint models. An important aspect of modeling the MESFET is a correct description of the behavior as a function of temperature.
Figure 1. Ids versus Vds for different Vgs voltages. The basic equations including the current source equations and the capacitance equations can be found in [1]. The essentials of the subthreshold model are described in [2] where the formulae are used to describe the CMOS subthreshold behavior.
Figure 2. Ids versus Vgs for Vds=1V for different temperatures. DC Results Tests have been performed for a variety of temperatures and device widths to check proper scaling and temperature dependencies. Drain-source current Ids, gate-drain and gate-source capacitances respectively Cgd and Cgs (CAPMOD and CAPDC=1) are represented versus bias for the depletion mode. A comparison between TOM-1 and TOM-2 dc characteristics (Ids-Vds) are plotted in Figure 1. The drain current is plotted versus Vgs for different temperatures in Figure 2.
Figure 3. Cgs versus Vds for different Vgs. Improved accuracy in the knee region is observed in the TOM-2 model characteristic. Similar results can be found in reference [3].
Figure 4. Cgd versus Vds for different Vgs.. Reference
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| © 1984 -
Silvaco Data Systems Inc. -
Trademarks - Privacy Policy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||